🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach and then dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.